Highlights the benefits and detriments of chemical castration for sexual offenders to society. Also contains real-life illustration of how this law can be used to offer the guilty a reprieve from his punishment.

Adheres to the castration penalty as sufficient in the prevention of repeat sexual offenders. Also insists that the method is effective and humane to both the criminal and the victim.

Voices out his opinion that the penalties of castrating sex offenders are inhumane and ineffective. Also suggests that a better prevention would be to lock rapists and molesters in high security mental facilities.

Claims that the statute of Florida’s 1997 Chemical Castration Law is a violation of human rights. Also asserts that the effectiveness of this penalty should only be narrowed to a small category of the offense.

Presents arguments leaning towards being against the proposition. Also includes illustrations, statistics, links to other related sites, and bibliography.

Highlights the background, process, and results of experimentation. Aims to research, prove, or disprove hypothesis that effects of chemical castration can be reversed after a long period of time.